Evaluation of analytical indicators after implementation of a quality management system in the clinicalchemistry area of a clinical analysis laboratory
Revista Bioquímica y Patología Clínica (ByPC) 
pdf (Spanish)
html (Spanish)
xml (Spanish)

Keywords

accreditation
verification
quality
quality management
quality indicators

How to Cite

Evaluation of analytical indicators after implementation of a quality management system in the clinicalchemistry area of a clinical analysis laboratory. (2025). Biochemistry and Clinical Pathology Journal, 89(3), 14-18. https://doi.org/10.62073/cc8jw408

Abstract

In recent years, quality has become the fundamental goal of clinical analysis laboratories.
The main objective is to guarantee patient safety, at the expense of rigorously controlled systems, both at the analytical stage and in the remaining processes. Objective: To evaluate the evolution of analytical Quality Indicators (QIs), before and after implementation of a Quality Management System (QMS), in the clinical chemistry area of a clinical analysis laboratory. Materials and methods: The performance of 28 analytes was evaluated and three QIs were used: Sigma Indicator (SI), Measurement Uncertainty Indicator (MUI) and External Quality Evaluation Indicator (EQEI). The analytes were monthly measured and the results were analyzed in the pre- and post-implementation periods of the QMS. The Roche Diagnostic cobas 8000 analytical platform, module c502, was used. Results: When comparing the pre- and post-implementation stages of the QMS, the results obtained showed statistically significant differences for all the indicators evaluated, and an improvement in the performance of the indicator was observed. Conclusion: The use of QIs at the analytical stage was effective to correctly monitor the performance of the analytes evaluated, allowing to objectively document the improvement of both internal and external quality control. Implementing a QMS allowed improving the analytical performance.

pdf (Spanish)
html (Spanish)
xml (Spanish)

References

1. Soto E, Isabel J. Conocimiento de NTP ISO 15189 y relación con la implementación de estándares del laboratorio clínico por tecnólogos médicos, Lima 2021. Universidad César Vallejo; 2022.

2. Suscriptor. ISO 15189: Sistema de Gestión de la Calidad en Laboratorios Clínicos [Internet]. Software ISO. ISOTools; 2014 [citado 7 de febrero 2024]. Disponible en: https://www.isotools.us/2016/02/29/iso-15189-sistema-gestion-calidad-en-laboratorios-clinicos/

3. Carboni-Huerta R, Sáenz-Flor K. Acreditación ISO 15189 en América Latina: Percepción en laboratorios de la región. Rev Mex Patol Clin Med Lab. 2019;66(3):143-153.

4. Fraiz FJ. Organización funcional de los laboratorios de análisis clínicos. Rev Diagn Biol [Internet]. 2003 Mar [citado 2024 Jul 04] ; 52(1): 40-5. Disponible en: https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_ar ttext&pid=S0034-79732003000100006 5. Cantero, F. (2015). Estudio de indicadores de calidad en pruebas de laboratorio realizadas en el lugar de asistencia al paciente [Tesis doctoral]. Universidad de Málaga. Disponible en: https://riuma.uma.es/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10630/12487/

5. -TD_CANTERO_SANCHEZ_Miguel_An gel.pdf?sequence=1

6. Viteri C, Ramos M, Galarraga E. Indicadores de control de calidad en laboratorios clínicos del C antón Ambato, Ecuador, 2021. Revista GICOS. 2023;8(1):40–99, https://portal.amelica.org/ameli/journal/351/3514065004/html/

7. Plebani M, Astion ML, Barth JH, Chen W, de Oliveira Galoro CA, Escuer MI, et al. Harmonization of quality indicators in laboratory medicine. A preliminary consensus. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM). 2014;52(7):951-8, https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2014-0142

8. International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Working Group “Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety”. Model of quality indicators. Milano, Italia: IFCC; 2017.

9. Sepetiene R. Quality indicators in laboratory medicine. Am J Biomed Sci Res [Internet]. 2021 [citado 2024 Feb 7];14(6):571–2. Disponible en: https://ifcc.org/ifcc-education-division/working-groupsspecial-projects/wg-leps/quality-indicators-project/. DOI: 10.34297/AJBSR.2021.14.002059

10. Sciacovelli L, Padoan A, Aita A, Basso D, Plebani M. Quality indicators in laboratory medicine: state-of-the-art, quality specifications and future strategies. Clin Chem Lab Med 2023;61(4):688–95, http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2022-1143

11. Organización Internacional de Normalización. Laboratorios Clínicos. Requisitos para la calidad y la competencia. NM ISO 15189:2014. Argentina

12. Pacheco AB, Silvia Zamory E, Collino CJG. Impacto de la implementación de un sistema documental en el aseguramiento de la calidad en un laboratorio de análisis clínicos de un hospital público. 2019;53(4): 511-24, https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=53562809013

13. Carchio SM, Cappella AC, Goedelmann C, Pandolfo M, Bustos D. Aplicación de Seis Sigma en el Laboratorio Clínico. Acta Bioquím Clín Latinoa [Internet]. 2019 Dic [citado 2024 Jul 09]; 53(4):525-537. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/journal/535/53562809014/html/

14. TIQConTM - Quality Desktop [Internet]. Tiqcon.com. [citado 2024 Feb 7]. Disponible en: https://roche.tiqcon.com/QD/Index/desktop

15. Control de Calidad Externo - Acceso de laboratorios [Internet]. [citado 2024 Feb 7]. Disponible en: http://200.69.143.220/cce/cgi/ CCE.cgi?AccionServidor =AccionAccesoLaboratorios

16. Westgard S. Consolidated comparison of chemistry performance specifications [Internet]. Westgard.com. [citado 2024 Feb 7]. Disponible en: https://www.westgard.com/ clia-a-quality/ quality-requirements/consolidated-comparison-of-chemistry-performance-specifications.html

17. Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI). User Verification of Precision and Estimation of Bias; Approved Guideline-Third Edition. EP15-A3. Wayne, PA; 2014.

18. Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI). Evaluation of Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures. 2nd ed EP06A. 2020.

19. Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI). Defining, Establishing, and Verifying Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory. EP28A3C 2010.

20. QC Frequency Calculator [Internet]. Westgard.com. [citado el 9 de julio de 2024]. Disponible en: https://tools.westgard.com/frequency_calculator.shtml

21. Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI). User Evaluation of Between-Reagent Lot Variation; Approved Guideline. CLSI document. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; EP26-A 2013.

22. Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI). Measurement Procedure Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved Guideline-Third Edition. EP09-A3. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2013.

23. Duan M, Ma X, Fan J, Guo Y, Wang W, Zhao H, et al. National surveys on 15 quality indicators for the total testing process in clinical laboratories of China from 2015 to 2017. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018;57(2):195–203, http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2018-0416