Abstract
Introduction: In recent years, different non-competitive immunoassays have been developed for the measurement of anti-TSH receptor antibodies (TRAbs), the main autoantigen of Graves’ Disease (GD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the analytical and clinical performance of two non-competitive methods for TRAbs measurement, in patients with and without GD. Materials and Methods: Serum samples were evaluated in a retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study. TRAbs were measured using Maglumi (Snibe) and TSI Immulite(Siemens). Pearson’s correlation coefficient, Bland-Altman plot analysis, Passing- Bablok regression, and kappa coefficient were determined. ROC curve analysis was determined for diagnostic validity. Results: The Pearson linear correlation coefficient was 0.93 (p= <0.0001). The Bland- Altman plot demonstrated a mean difference of 0.69. The Passing-Bablok regression proved the presence of constant and proportional differences between methods. The kappa was 0.59. The sensitivity of TSI Immulite was 84.6%, whereas that of Maglumi was 57%. Discussion: The methods demonstrated excellent correlation and acceptable diagnostic concordance with good sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis and monitoring of GD. However, the methods are not interchangeable. Monitoring should be done using the same methodology. TSI Immulite detected a higher percentage of positive samples than Maglumi. Low concentration of thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulin was found in patients with GD in remission. It would be necessary to research a prognostic cut-off value for remission before suspension of antithyroid drugs in this population.
References
Cooper GS, Stroehla BC. The Epidemiology of Autoimmune Diseases. Autoimmun Rev. 2003; 2: 119-125.
Morshed SA, Davies TF. Graves’ Disease Mechanisms: The Role of Stimulating, Blocking, and Cleavage Region TSH Receptor Antibodies. Horm Metab Res. 2015; 47(10):727-34.
Evans M, Sanders J, Tagami T, Sanders P, Young S, Roberts E, et al. Monoclonal autoantibodies to the TSH receptor, one with stimulating activity and one with blocking activity, obtained from the same blood sample. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2010; 73(3):404-12.
Tozzoli R, D’Aurizio F, Villalta D, Giovanella L. Evaluation of the first fully automated immunoassay method for the measurement of stimulating TSH receptor autoantibodies in Graves’ disease. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017;55(1):58-64.
Burns C, Tiplady R, Rigsby P. WHO international collaborative study of the proposed 2nd international standard for thyroid stimulating antibody. Biologicals Unit & WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization. World Health Organization; 2010. [Internet]. Disponible en: WHO/BS/10.2142. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/70583
Hamasaki H, Yoshimi T, Yanai H. A patient with Graves’ disease showing only psychiatric symptoms and negativity for both TSH receptor autoantibody and thyroid stimulating antibody. Thyroid Res. 2012 ;5(1):19.
Diana T, Wüster C, Olivo PD, Unterrainer A, König J, Kanitz M, et al. Performance and Specificity of 6 Immunoassays for TSH Receptor Antibodies: A Multicenter Study. Eur Thyroid J. 2017; 6(5):243-249.
Furmaniak J, Sanders J, Rees Smith B. Blocking type TSH receptor antibodies. Autoimmunity highlights. 2012; 4(1), 11–26.
Hu Y, Ni J, Cen Y, Zhang B, Wu W, Cheng W, et al. Evaluation of analytic and clinical performance of two immunoassays for detecting thyroidstimulating receptor antibody in the diagnosis of Graves’ disease. J Clin Lab Anal. 2021; 35(12):e23950.
Silvestre R, Lafuente A, Jiménez-Mendiguchía L, García-Cano A, López, R, García-Izquierdo B, et al.Comparación de tres métodos para la medida de la concentración de anticuerpos anti-receptor de tirotropina (TRAb) en el diagnóstico de la enfermedad de Graves. Validación clínica. Adv Lab Med 2020;2(2): 229-235
McLachlan SM, Rapoport B. Thyrotropin-blocking autoantibodies and thyroid-stimulating autoantibodies: potential mechanisms involved in the pendulum swinging from hypothyroidism to hyperthyroidism or vice versa. Thyroid. 2013;23(1):14-24.
